欢迎你 15210579574  |  进入个人中心  |  退出
2019西医考研

权威题库 | 电子书 | 校友卡 | 移动课堂

考研英语冲刺模拟试题(4)

2017-08-22 来源:京师杏林考研网 分享到:

0


考研英语冲刺模拟试题(4)


As you read this, nearly 80,000 Americans are waiting for a new heart, kidney or some other organ that could save their life. Tragically, about 6,000 of them will die this year——nearly twice as many people as perished in the Sept. 11 attacks——because they won't get their transplant in time. The vast majority of Americans (86%, according to one poll) say they support organ donation. But only 20% actually sign up to do it. Why the shortfall?Part of the problem is the way we handle organ donations. Americans who want to make this sort of gift have to opt in——that is, indicate on a driver's license that when they die, they want their organs to be made available. Many European and Asian countries take the opposite approach; in Singapore, for example, all residents receive a letter when they come of age informing them that their organs may be harvested unless they explicitly object. In Belgium, which adopted a similar presumed-consent system 12 years ago, less than 2% of the population has decided to opt out.

  Further complicating the situation in the U.S. is the fact that whatever decision you make can be overruled by your family. The final say is left to your surviving relatives, who must make up their minds in the critical hours after brain death has been declared. There are as many as 50 body parts, from your skin to your corneas, that can save or transform the life of a potential recipient, but for many families lost in grief, the idea of dismembering a loved one is more than they can bear.

The U.S., like all medically advanced societies, has struggled to find a way to balance an individual's rightful sovereignty over his or her body with society's need to save its members from avoidable deaths. Given America's tradition of rugged individualism and native distrust of Big Brotherly interference, it's not surprising that voters resisted attempts to switch to a presumed-consent system when it was proposed in California, Oregon, Minnesota, Pennsyl

  lvania and Maryland. Health Secretary Tommy Thompson last spring announced plans for a new initiative to encourage donations——including clearer consent forms——but its impact is expected to be modest. Given the crying need for organs, perhaps it's time we considered shifting to something closer to the presumed-consent model.

  Meanwhile, if you want to ensure that your organs are donated when you die, you should say so in a living will or fill out a Uniform Donor Card (available from the American Medical Association)。 Make sure your closest relatives know about it. And if you don't want to donate an organ, you should make your wishes equally explicit.

注(1):本文选自Time; 12/10/2001, p117;

  注(2):本文习题命题模仿对象2003年真题text 3;

  1. According to the author, one of the reasons for a shortage of organs in America is ______.

  [A] most Americans are reluctant to donate their organs after death

  [B] the information about organ donation is not popular in America

  [C] the ways to handle organ donation is far from perfect

  [D] people waiting for transplant are rapidly increasing in America

2. What is most Americans‘ attitude towards the organ donation?

  [A] Indifferent.

  [B] Indignant.

  [C] Detached.

  [D] Supportive.

  3. It can be inferred from paragraph 4 that ______.

  [A] Americans have a long tradition of weak individualism

  [B] all the states in America resist the presumed-consent system

  [C] it‘s not easy to find a way to serve the society’s need and at the same time to protect the individual‘s right in the matter of organ donation

  [D] the government is not active in solving the problem

4. The term “presumed-consent” probably means ______.

  [A] one‘s organs should be donated whether they agree or not

  [B] one is supposed to agree that their organ will be donated after death unless they explicitly object

  [C] dismembering a dead bo

  dy is inhuman

  [D] one is assumed to be happy after they decide to donate their organs

  5. From the text, we can see the author‘s attitude towards organ donation is ______.

  [A] supportive

  [B] indignant

  [C] indifferent

  [D] negative

  参考答案:1.C  2.D  3.C  4.B  5.A

更多模拟试题请关注京师杏林考研网。


上一篇:考研英语冲刺模拟试题(3)

下一篇:考研英语冲刺模拟试题(5)

面授集训

2019京师考研疯狂特训营 点击查看>>京师考研课程
辅导类型暑期强化集训营半年集训营咨询
西综集训营 23800元 46800元起 立即咨询
中综集训营 23800元 46800元起
免费试听更多>>
更多>>豪华师资
更多>>热门推荐

考研政治复习备考经验

考研复习备考经验   相信很多正在复习2019考研考试的考生们都非常关注备考中的注意事项,小编特整理了复习备考经验,希望对大家能够有所帮助……点击查看>>

学员分享更多>>

学员:大伟

在我快被考研数学虐哭时,是京师考研的老师们耐心的解答,一边边讲解知识点的帮助,让我渐渐增加了考研信心。衷心感谢网校老师!

学员:元元

这平台太给力了!不但能电脑听课,还可以用手机听课,用pad听课。解答问题也非常快速,最最重要的是非常非常负责任!顶起!

学员:17080116

课程讲解很详细,讲义也非常详细。听完课程,做做练习册,很容易就掌握了知识。京师考研的老师们辛苦啦!

学员:changqing

老师讲课很好,重点分明,层次很清楚,跟着老师学了一段时间,感觉自己复习起来思路也清晰了很多,很见功力,不愧是考研辅导界实力派老师!

学员:大伟

在我快被考研数学虐哭时,是京师考研的老师们耐心的解答,一边边讲解知识点的帮助,让我渐渐增加了考研信心。衷心感谢网校老师!

学员:元元

这平台太给力了!不但能电脑听课,还可以用手机听课,用pad听课。解答问题也非常快速,最最重要的是非常非常负责任!顶起!

学员:17080116

课程讲解很详细,讲义也非常详细。听完课程,做做练习册,很容易就掌握了知识。京师考研的老师们辛苦啦!

学员:changqing

老师讲课很好,重点分明,层次很清楚,跟着老师学了一段时间,感觉自己复习起来思路也清晰了很多,很见功力,不愧是考研辅导界实力派老师!

2019考研班型

全年集训营

2019考研班型

网课班型

定向班 协议班 全程班(特价班)

面授班型

医考全年班 医考半年班

集训营

寒假训练营 医考全年营 医考春季营

400-678-0100